The Vermont Statutes Online
The Statutes below include the actions of the 2025 session of the General Assembly.
NOTE: The Vermont Statutes Online is an unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated that is provided as a convenience.
Subchapter
002
:
PERSONS FOR WHOM GUARDIANS APPOINTED
(Cite as: 14 V.S.A. § 2667)
-
§ 2667. Order for visitation, contact, or information; immediate harm to the minor
(a) The Probate Division of the Superior Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear
any action to enforce, modify, or terminate the initial order issued by the Family
Division of the Superior Court for visitation, contact, or information.
(b) Upon a showing by affidavit of immediate harm to the child, the Probate Division of
the Superior Court may temporarily stay the order of visitation or contact on an ex
parte basis until a hearing can be held, or stay the order of permanent guardianship
and transfer legal custody of the child to the Commissioner for Children and Families.
(1) The order transferring the child’s legal custody to the Commissioner shall have the
same legal effect as a similar order issued by the Family Division under the authority
of 33 V.S.A. chapters 51-53.
(2) The Probate Division shall then immediately notify the Department for Children and
Families, the State’s Attorney, and the Family Division when it has issued an order
transferring the child’s legal custody to the Commissioner, and nothing in this subsection
shall prohibit the State from commencing proceedings under 33 V.S.A. chapters 51-53.
(c) Nothing in this section shall limit the jurisdiction of the Family Division of the
Superior Court to enter an abuse prevention order pursuant to 15 V.S.A. chapter 21.
A breach by the permanent guardian of an order for visitation, contact or information
shall not be grounds for voiding or terminating the permanent guardianship. However,
the court may enforce the order with all the powers and remedies of the court, including
contempt.
(d) A modification of an order of visitation or contact shall be based upon a finding
by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a substantial change in the
material circumstances, and that the proposed modification is in the best interests
of the child. (Added 1999, No. 162 (Adj. Sess.), § 2; amended 2009, No. 97 (Adj. Sess.), § 7; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 238; No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 238a, eff. Feb. 1, 2011; 2015, No. 153 (Adj. Sess.), § 24.)