§ 5755. Findings
The General Assembly finds that:
(1) Private and public forestlands:
(A) constitute unique and irreplaceable resources, benefits, and values of statewide importance;
(B) contribute to the protection and conservation of wildlife, wildlife habitat, air,
water, and soil resources of the State;
(C) provide a resource for the State constitutional right to hunt, fish, and trap;
(D) mitigate the effects of climate change; and
(E) result in general benefit to the health and welfare of the people of the State.
(2) The forest products industry, including maple sap collection:
(A) is a major contributor to and is valuable to the State’s economy by providing jobs
to its citizens;
(B) is essential to the manufacture of forest products that are used and enjoyed by the
people of the State; and
(C) benefits the general welfare of the people of the State.
(3) Private and public forestlands are critical for and contribute significantly to the
State’s outdoor recreation and tourism economies.
(4) The economic management of public and private forestlands contributes to sustaining
long-term forest health, integrity, and productivity.
(5) Forestry operations are adversely impacted by the encroachment of urban, commercial,
and residential land uses throughout the State that result in forest fragmentation
and conversion and erode the health and sustainability of remaining forests.
(6) As a result of encroachment on forests, conflicts have arisen between traditional
forestry land uses and urban, commercial, and residential land uses that threaten
to permanently convert forestland to other uses, resulting in an adverse impact to
the economy and natural environment of the State.
(7) The encouragement, development, improvement, and continuation of forestry operations
will result in a general benefit to the health and welfare of the people of the State
and the State’s economy.
(8) The forest products industry, in order to survive, likely will need to change, adopt
new technologies, and diversify into new products.
(9) Conventional forestry practices, including logging, transportation, and processing
of forest products may be subject to unnecessary or adversarial lawsuits based on
the theory of nuisance. Nuisance suits could encourage and result in the conversion
of forestland and loss of the forest products industry.
(10) It is in the public interest of the people of the State to ensure that lawfully conducted
conventional forestry practices are protected and encouraged and are not subject to
public and private nuisance actions arising out of conflicts between forestry operations
and urban, commercial, and residential uses. (Added 2017, No. 198 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. May 30, 2018.)
§ 5756. Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(1) “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of Forests, Parks and Recreation.
(2) “Conventional forestry practices” means:
(A) forestry operations;
(B) a change in ownership or size of a parcel on which a forestry operation is being conducted;
(C) cessation or interruption of a forestry operation or a change in a forestry operation,
including a change in the type of a forestry operation;
(D) enrollment in governmental forestry or conservation programs;
(E) adoption of new forestry technology;
(F) construction, maintenance, and repair of log landings, logging roads, and skid trails;
(G) visual changes due to the removal, storage, or stockpiling of vegetation or forest
products;
(H) noise from forestry equipment used as part of a forestry operation; or
(I) the transport or trucking of forest products or of equipment on, to, or from the site
of a forestry operation.
(3) “Forest product” means logs; pulpwood; veneer; bolt wood; wood chips; stud wood; poles;
pilings; biomass; fuel wood; maple sap; or bark.
(4) “Forestry operation” means activities related to the management of forests, including
timber harvests; removal, storage, or stockpiling of vegetation or timber; pruning;
planting; lumber processing with portable sawmills; reforestation; pest, disease,
and invasive species control; wildlife habitat management; and fertilization. “Forestry
operation” includes one or both of the following:
(A) the primary processing of forest products on a parcel where a timber harvest occurs;
and
(B) the primary processing of forest products at a site that is not the harvest site,
provided that:
(i) the person conducting the forestry operations owns or has permission to use the site
for the forestry operation;
(ii) the forestry operation was established prior to surrounding activities that are not
forestry operations;
(iii) the site is used by the forestry operation for 12 or fewer months in any two-year
period or 24 or fewer months in any five-year period;
(iv) the forestry operation complies with all applicable law; and
(v) only portable, nonpermanent equipment is used to process the forest products at the
site.
(5) “Timber” means trees, saplings, seedlings, and sprouts from which trees of every size,
nature, kind, and description may grow.
(6) “Timber harvest” means a forestry operation involving the harvesting of timber. (Added 2017, No. 198 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. May 30, 2018.)
§ 5757. Forestry operations; protection from nuisance lawsuits
(a) Except as provided for under subsections (b) and (c) of this section, a person conducting
a conventional forestry practice shall be entitled to a rebuttable presumption that
the conventional forestry practice does not constitute a public or private nuisance
if the person conducts the conventional forestry practice in compliance with the following:
(1) the Acceptable Management Practices for Maintaining Water Quality on Logging Jobs
in Vermont as adopted by the Commissioner under 10 V.S.A. § 2622; and
(2) other applicable law.
(b) The presumption under subsection (a) of this section that a person conducting a conventional
forestry practice does not constitute a nuisance may be rebutted by showing:
(1) a nuisance resulted from the negligent operation of the conventional forestry practice;
(2) a nuisance resulted from a violation of State, federal, or other applicable law during
the conduct of the conventional forestry practice; or
(3) clear and convincing evidence that the conventional forestry practice has a substantial
adverse effect on the health, safety, or welfare of the complaining party.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of State or local
boards of health to abate nuisances affecting the public health. (Added 2017, No. 198 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. May 30, 2018.)